Call 847-254-2171
Jul
06
2020
Interesting read on a TER review of ADA

Wow, gents, I guess I am amazed at some of the hobbyists out there's reviews of some providers. For example, I read Cognac060's TER review of (provider) ADA today (rated her a 6 (nice) in appearance and a 6 (nice time) in performance). His final comments in the juicies (that only VIP's see):  "From what I know she does not allow daty or kissing. She is pretty mechanical in her routine. Obviously photos are fake, but at least she is in shape."  

So the way I read that, thin skinny woman gets a 6 in looks and 6 in performance just because she is skinny even though her pictures are fake and she gives a robotic performance and doesn't kiss or allow DATY..Hell, many of my reviews are 6's in nice time performances, what the heck did ADA earn even a 6 performance rating for? The way I understand the rating system, that should have been a "should have stayed home performance" for most men. I mean, they can get robotic performances at home.

Think about why many men embrace this hobby. They want more than a quick handjob or some perfunctory missionary once every few months or once a month, or a blow job once a year on their birthday (yes, I know many of you now wonder who THOSE men are that get it on their birthday, lucky ducks!).  

Yes, I have many men that desire to visit me on their birthday! So I guess most wives don't provide that reward.

What I would like to see from these hobbyist reviewers is some ratings and reviews that make sense. Not based on the fact that they are thin athletic spinners. 

Hugs and kisses, 

Anita